EDAIC Pass Rate and Pass Mark: What You Need to Know for 2026
The EDAIC pass rate varies by sitting, but the pass mark is criterion-referenced, not a quota. Understanding how standard setting works — and what it means for your preparation — matters far more than historical percentages.

When you begin preparing for the European Diploma in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, the question inevitably arises: "What's the EDAIC pass rate?" It's natural to want to know your odds, benchmark your readiness, and understand what "passing" actually means.
But the answer is more nuanced than a single percentage. The EDAIC pass rate fluctuates from sitting to sitting, and crucially, the pass mark itself is neither fixed nor quota-based. Grasping how the pass mark is determined — and what that means for you as a candidate — is far more valuable than fixating on historical statistics.
How the EDAIC Pass Mark Is Set
The EDAIC Part 1 written examination employs criterion-referenced standard setting. In practical terms, this asks: "What level of knowledge must a minimally competent anaesthetist-in-training demonstrate at this stage?"
The method is an Angoff-style approach. A panel of subject-matter experts — experienced anaesthetists and examiners — reviews each question. For every statement in the Multiple True/False (MTF) format, they estimate the probability that a borderline candidate (someone just at the threshold of competence) would answer it correctly. These probabilities are aggregated across all statements to produce a pass mark for that specific exam.
This differs fundamentally from norm-referenced or quota-based systems, where a fixed percentage of candidates pass regardless of absolute performance. In a criterion-referenced exam, if every candidate meets the required standard, every candidate can pass. Conversely, if the cohort underperforms, the pass rate may be lower — but the standard remains consistent across sittings.
Key point: The EDAIC does not operate a quota. The pass mark reflects a defined level of competence, not a predetermined percentage of successful candidates.
What This Means for Candidates
First, you are not competing against your peers. Your performance is judged against an objective standard. If you meet that standard, you pass — whether 40% or 75% of the cohort also passes is irrelevant to your result.
Second, the pass mark can vary slightly between sittings. A paper with more challenging questions may have a marginally lower pass mark; an easier paper may have a slightly higher one. The Angoff process adjusts for this, aiming to keep the threshold of competence stable over time.
Third, there is no negative marking (this was removed in 2014). Each of the five statements in an MTF question is scored independently: a correct answer scores a mark, an incorrect or blank answer scores zero. This means you should answer every statement. There is no penalty for guessing when uncertain.
Fourth, strategic preparation matters more than rote memorisation. Because the standard is criterion-referenced, your goal is to build robust, exam-relevant understanding across the core curriculum — anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, physics and clinical measurement, equipment, statistics, clinical anaesthesia, intensive care, regional anaesthesia, emergency medicine, and pain. Breadth and depth both count.