How to Use a Study Partner for EDAIC Part 2 Oral Exam Success
A practical peer-practice system for the EDAIC Part 2 viva: roles, question ladders, time-boxing, feedback rules and a copyable session agenda to sharpen your SOE performance.

Preparing for the EDAIC Part 2 structured oral examination (SOE) alone is possible, but practising with an EDAIC Part 2 study partner transforms passive revision into active performance. The viva tests not only your knowledge but also your ability to think aloud, structure answers under pressure, and respond to examiner cues—all skills honed through deliberate peer practice. This guide offers a structured, respectful system for EDAIC viva study group sessions that mirror the exam environment and accelerate your readiness.
Why a Study Partner Works for the EDAIC Part 2
The EDAIC Part 2 is a structured oral examination comprising guided clinical questions across the breadth of anaesthesia and intensive care. Unlike the written Part 1, success depends on verbal fluency, logical sequencing, and the ability to course-correct when prompted. Silent reading cannot replicate these demands. An EDAIC SOE practice partner provides:
- Real-time feedback on clarity, pace and structure.
- Examiner simulation, including follow-up questions and redirection.
- Accountability: scheduled sessions enforce discipline.
- Mutual learning: explaining a topic to your partner consolidates your own understanding.
- Emotional rehearsal: practising under mild stress inoculates you against viva-day nerves.
Choose a partner at a similar stage of preparation, ideally someone who has also passed Part 1 and is committed to regular, structured sessions.
Setting Ground Rules and Boundaries
Before your first session, agree on three non-negotiables:
- Confidentiality and ethics: Do not share recalled examination material from recent sittings, patient-identifiable clinical cases, or proprietary content from commercial courses without permission. Base your questions on published guidelines, standard texts and the EDAIC syllabus.
- Constructive feedback only: Critique the answer, not the person. Use "I noticed…" rather than "You always…".
- Equal time: Each partner gets the same duration in the candidate seat. No one dominates the session.
Establish a regular schedule—two or three 90-minute sessions per week in the final eight weeks is a realistic target. Consistency matters more than marathon sessions.
The Peer-Practice Session Structure
A disciplined format keeps sessions productive. Here is a copyable 90-minute agenda:
Session Agenda (90 minutes)
0–5 min: Check-in
Briefly share which domains you revised since the last session and any areas of difficulty. No detailed discussion yet—just signposting.
5–40 min: Partner A as candidate (35 min practice)
- Question 1 (12 min): Partner B (examiner) poses a clinical scenario from Domain X. Partner A answers aloud. Partner B may interrupt with clarifying or redirecting prompts ("Tell me more about your choice of induction agent," "What if the patient were pregnant?").
- Question 2 (12 min): A second scenario from a different domain.
- Question 3 (11 min): A third scenario, again from a new domain.
40–45 min: Feedback for Partner A (5 min)
Partner B gives structured feedback (see below). Partner A listens, asks one clarifying question if needed, then thanks Partner B. No lengthy defence or debate.
45–80 min: Partner B as candidate (35 min practice)
Repeat the three-question cycle with roles reversed. Partner A is now the examiner.
80–85 min: Feedback for Partner B (5 min)
Partner A gives structured feedback.
85–90 min: Debrief and next-session planning (5 min)
Agree which domains to cover next time and any specific weak areas to target. Log the session date and topics in a shared document or spreadsheet.
Start preparing for EDAIC Part I
Syllabus-mapped lessons, 30,000 MTF questions, spaced-repetition flashcards and an AI study plan — in one platform.
Start free