EDAIC Part 2 Format: The Oral Exam (SOE) Explained

If you have passed the written papers, the next milestone is a face-to-face viva — and understanding the edaic part 2 format before you walk in is half the battle. Part 2 is a structured oral examination (SOE), generally conducted in English, in which trained examiners work through guided clinical and basic-science questions to probe how you actually think under pressure. This guide breaks down the structure, the examiner roles, how answers are scored, and how to use the short preparation time before each session to your advantage.

It is a different test of the same knowledge. Part 1 asks whether you recognise a fact; Part 2 asks whether you can reason out loud, justify a plan, and stay safe when an examiner gently pushes back. The good news: the format is predictable, fair, and very learnable once you know what to expect.

Where Part 2 sits in the EDAIC journey

The European Diploma in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EDAIC), awarded by ESAIC, is taken in two stages. Part 1 is a written examination of two multiple-true/false papers — Paper A (Basic Sciences) and Paper B (Clinical Anaesthesia and Intensive Care). Part 2 is the structured oral exam you become eligible for only after passing Part 1.

If you are still working through the written stage, or want to confirm exactly what it covers, start with our complete guide to EDAIC Part 1 and the detailed breakdown of Paper A and Paper B. Everything you revised for those papers is fair game again in the viva — this time spoken, applied, and defended.

A few anchor facts worth fixing in your mind:

Part 2 is an oral exam (a viva), not a written one.
It is generally conducted in English, even though Part 1 is offered in several European languages.
You sit it after passing Part 1 (or after an ESAIC-recognised exemption route such as a qualifying OLA result — see our explainer on the OLA online assessment).
Standard setting remains criterion-referenced: you are measured against a defined standard of competence, not ranked against the other candidates in the room.

The edaic part 2 structure: separate guided-question sessions

The defining feature of the edaic part 2 structure is that it is structured. Rather than one long, rambling conversation, the exam is divided into several distinct sessions (often called stations), each with its own theme, its own pair of examiners, and its own guided questions.

Broadly, these sessions span the same two domains you already know from the written papers:

Basic sciences applied to anaesthesia — anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, physics, clinical measurement and equipment, asked in a way that connects the science to a patient at the bedside.
Clinical anaesthesia and intensive care — perioperative management, regional and sub-specialty anaesthesia, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain.

Each session is built around edaic guided questions: the examiners follow a prepared script of clinical scenarios and prompts. This is deliberate. The guided format means every candidate on a given day is asked an equivalent set of questions to an equivalent standard, which makes the exam fairer and more reproducible than a free-form chat ever could be. Two candidates sitting the same session are tested against the same blueprint, not against whatever happened to be on one examiner's mind.

How a typical session flows

Although the exact number of sessions, their precise length, and the order can vary by cycle — always confirm the current arrangement on the official ESAIC/EDAIC website — the rhythm within a session is consistent:

A short reading/preparation period before some sessions, where you are given the scenario, data, or images to study (more on this below).
An opening question that sets the clinical scene — for example, a patient presenting for a particular operation, or a deteriorating patient on the intensive care unit.
Progressive probing, where the examiners build on your answers, add complications, and escalate. A straightforward case can quickly become a difficult airway, a haemorrhage, or a failing organ system.
A clean break at the end of the time, after which you move to the next session and a fresh pair of examiners.

That fresh start each time matters. A weaker session does not have to sink you — each one is a new opportunity with examiners who have not heard your previous answers.

The edaic soe format: examiner roles and the room

In the edaic soe format, you typically face two examiners per session. Their roles are complementary rather than adversarial:

One examiner usually leads the questioning, steering you through the guided scenario and asking the bulk of the questions.
The other often observes and scores, sometimes asking follow-ups, and ensures the session keeps to the standardised script and timing.

Both examiners are experienced anaesthetists, frequently drawn from across Europe, and many are not native English speakers themselves — which is precisely why the exam is run in clear, clinical English rather than idiomatic conversation. They are trained to assess to a common standard and are not there to trip you up. When an examiner challenges an answer, it is usually to test the robustness of your reasoning, not to signal that you are wrong. Holding your position with sound justification — or revising it gracefully when the challenge is valid — both score well.

What the examiners are actually listening for

The viva rewards a particular kind of answer. Examiners are listening for:

A safe, structured approach — airway, breathing, circulation; resuscitate before you investigate; treat the patient in front of you.
Prioritisation — saying the most important thing first, not burying the safe action under a list of trivia.
Justification — explaining why, not just what.
Awareness of limits — recognising when you would call for help, escalate, or follow a specific published guideline.

This is the heart of the difference between Part 1 and Part 2, and it is worth internalising early in your revision.

EDAIC viva vs Part 1 written: a quick comparison

The edaic viva tests overlapping content with a very different skill set. Mapping the two side by side helps you redirect your preparation.

Feature	Part 1 (written)	Part 2 (oral / SOE)
Format	Two MTF papers (A and B)	Structured oral, multiple guided sessions
Question style	Stem + five A–E true/false statements	Spoken scenarios with progressive probing
Language	Several European languages offered	Generally English
What it tests	Factual recognition and recall	Reasoning, prioritisation, safe application
Marking	No negative marking; answer everything	Qualitative, criterion-referenced scoring per session
Pacing	You control it within the time limit	Examiner-led; you must respond in real time

Because the content base is shared, strong Part 1 preparation is the foundation for Part 2 — but it is not sufficient on its own. You have to rehearse saying it out loud. For the underlying knowledge, our intensive care revision guide for Paper B and the high-yield pharmacology topics list map almost directly onto common viva themes.

How answers are scored in the SOE

Scoring in the SOE is qualitative and criterion-referenced, applied session by session. Rather than counting marks for individual facts, examiners judge your overall performance in each session against a defined standard of safe, competent practice, and assign a grade for that session.

Because the precise grading scale, the exact number of sessions, and the pass threshold can be revised between cycles, treat the official ESAIC/EDAIC documentation as the single source of truth and check it for the cycle you are sitting. What does not change is the philosophy:

You are assessed against a standard, not a quota — there is no fixed number of passes per sitting, mirroring the Angoff-style criterion-referencing used in Part 1. Our explainer on the EDAIC pass mark and pass rate covers this mindset in depth.
Consistency across sessions matters. A reliably safe candidate across every session is exactly what the exam is designed to identify.
Safety is decisive. An answer that is technically detailed but unsafe scores worse than a simple, safe, well-prioritised plan.

Common ways candidates lose marks

In my experience coaching trainees, marks slip away for predictable reasons rather than gaps in raw knowledge:

Freezing or going silent. Thinking aloud, even imperfectly, beats a long pause.
Disorganised answers. A safe ABC structure that you say first reassures the examiner immediately.
Over-talking. Answer the question that was asked, then stop and let the examiner steer.
Ignoring safety to chase detail. Reciting a rare drug interaction while the simulated patient is hypoxic is a classic trap.

You will find more of these pitfalls catalogued in our guide to the common mistakes that fail EDAIC candidates.

The short preparation time before each session

A feature that surprises first-timers is that some sessions give you a brief preparation period before the questioning begins — a few minutes to read a clinical vignette, study an X-ray, ECG, blood-gas result, ventilator trace, or equipment diagram, and gather your thoughts.

This window is short, so use it with discipline:

Read the whole scenario first before fixating on any one detail.
Frame a safe opening line in your head — usually a structured assessment of the patient — so you start fluently rather than scrambling.
Anticipate the obvious escalation. If you are handed a trauma case, expect bleeding and airway; if it is a sick ICU patient, expect organ support and deterioration.
Note the abnormal values on any data you are given, because the examiners will almost certainly ask you to interpret them.

Walking in with a calm opening sentence already prepared sets the tone for the whole session and steadies your nerves.

How to prepare for the edaic part 2 format

Preparing for an oral exam is an active, spoken process — reading silently is not enough. A few principles that consistently help:

Practise out loud, with a partner

Find a study partner or senior colleague and run mock vivas. Sit across a table, hand each other scenarios, and force yourself to verbalise a structured plan in real time. Recording yourself and listening back is uncomfortable but extremely revealing.

Build scenario scripts, not just fact lists

For high-frequency topics — the difficult airway, local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), major haemorrhage, sepsis, the unstable cardiac patient — rehearse a safe, sequential approach you can deliver smoothly. As revision pointers (always follow current local and published guidelines in real practice):

LAST: stop injecting, call for help, manage airway and oxygenation, control seizures, and give intravenous lipid emulsion early, with prolonged resuscitation if needed.
Unanticipated difficult airway: a stepwise plan — optimise mask ventilation, supraglottic rescue, then the can't-intubate-can't-oxygenate pathway to front-of-neck access — anchored to a recognised difficult-airway guideline.

Keep your underlying knowledge sharp

You cannot reason fluently about facts you have half-forgotten. Spaced, active revision keeps the foundation solid — our pieces on spaced repetition for long-term memory and building an effective EDAIC study plan translate directly to oral preparation. Drilling structured questions also trains the recall speed a viva demands; see how to use an EDAIC question bank effectively.

Rehearse in English

Even confident English speakers benefit from rehearsing clinical explanations aloud in English until the phrasing is automatic. The aim is not eloquence — it is clear, unambiguous, safe communication under time pressure.

A note for international medical graduates

The EDAIC is deliberately international, and the viva is designed to be navigable by candidates trained anywhere in the world. Examiners are accustomed to a wide range of accents and clinical backgrounds and are assessing your reasoning, not your fluency. If you are weighing the EDAIC against other diplomas, our comparison of the EDAIC versus the FRCA may help you place it in context; the two are separate qualifications with different awarding bodies, the EDAIC being the broadly comparable pan-European diploma.

Frequently asked questions

How is the EDAIC Part 2 structured?

Part 2 is a structured oral examination (SOE) divided into several guided-question sessions, typically with two examiners each, spanning basic sciences applied to anaesthesia and clinical anaesthesia and intensive care. Each session follows a standardised script of scenarios. For the exact number of sessions and their timings in your cycle, check the official ESAIC/EDAIC website.

What language is the EDAIC oral exam conducted in?

Part 2 is generally conducted in English, even though the Part 1 written exam is offered in several European languages. Examiners are used to a wide range of accents and assess the safety and structure of your reasoning, not your eloquence.

How are answers marked in the SOE?

Marking is qualitative and criterion-referenced: examiners grade your performance in each session against a defined standard of safe, competent practice, rather than counting individual facts or ranking you against other candidates. There is no fixed pass quota. Confirm the current grading scale on the official ESAIC/EDAIC website.

Do I get preparation time before the viva?

Some sessions include a short preparation period in which you are given a clinical scenario or data (such as an ECG, blood gas, or imaging) to study before questioning begins. Use it to read everything, identify the abnormal findings, and frame a safe opening line.

Can I sit Part 2 without passing Part 1?

No. You become eligible for the Part 2 oral exam only after passing Part 1 (or via an ESAIC-recognised exemption route such as a qualifying OLA result). Confirm eligibility and the next cycle's dates on the official myESAIC website — note the 2026 Part 1 written exam is on 19 September 2026, and that sitting's registration window has already closed.

Ready to build the knowledge base that makes the viva feel manageable? Create a free AnesCORE account and start drilling structured, exam-style questions in our EDAIC question bank — the fastest way to turn recognition into the confident, spoken reasoning the SOE rewards.